Honda’s Blackbird may have been over-run in the
performance stakes, but it’s still a formidable bit of
kit
To this day, over two decades later, it all seems a bit
mad. Motorcycle makers – or at least some of them – were
locked in this power race for the bragging rights attached
to having the world’s fastest production motorcycle. In
1996, for the 1997 model year, Honda snatched the gong
with its CBR1100XX, aka the Super Blackbird.
It could claim a legitimate 290km/h top speed, a little
quicker than Kawasaki’s reigning ZZ-R1100. A couple of
years later, Suzuki wandered in and trounced the lot of
them with the GSX1300R Hayabusa.
Never mind the power race, there was something else going
on: the Blackbird marked a significant step in the
progression of the sophistication of big performance
motorcycles. Perhaps greater than we realised when they
were first launched.
So what was this wonderful new technology? Err, there
wasn’t any, really. It’s all about refinement and
attention to detail. This was a very conventional
sports-touring multi. The chassis was based on a big and
solid twin-spar aluminium frame, with conventional fork up
front and monoshock rear. The brakes were a bit different
and we’ll get to them later.
In the engine room, you scored a 16-valve liquid-cooled
four fed by a bank of 42mm CV carbs. Those carburettors
were replaced with the firm’s in-house injection for the
second-gen bike, in 1999. Meanwhile the transmission was a
six-speeder with an hydraulically-actuated wet clutch.
That lot added up to compelling if not revolutionary
stats: 164 horses (112kW) for a dry weight of 223. Plenty
of urge in a package that was pretty trim, given it was in
fact a reasonably civilised two-seater.
At the time, the give-away this was something a bit
special was the styling. The ‘stacked’ headlight was
definitely an out-there design cue for the day, while the
understated graphics and strangely-shaped tail were
talking points. What the…? The clue was in the name –
Blackbird. Honda’s latest flight of fancy was an homage to the
3900km/h Lockheed SR-71 spy plane and, if you look
at both, you can see the styling links – particularly in
the headlamp and tail section of the motorcycle.
What was it like in the saddle? Fast. Yeah, righto, you
could probably predict that. For its day, this was a
formidably quick bit of kit. The one criticism was a flat
spot in the mid-range in the carburettor model, which
could be tuned out to some extent. Really, I’ve not heard
owners complaining about it, and many riders will never
notice. Any hint of that disappeared on the injected
versions. With revs on board, in carburettor or injected
form, this is a fast and ultra-smooth powerplant that
seems to keep on giving right the way through to its
10,000rpm peak power point.
In fact, tied with capable suspension running very much
road rather than track rates, this is a deceptively quick
motorcycle. It’s all too easy to hop on and very soon
discover you’re travelling a whole lot quicker than
intended.
Since we’ve raised suspension, the only adjustment was for
rear spring preload and rebound damping. That was
under-done, given the performance expectations and its
status.
The rates were well thought out as a compromise and there
was enough travel for this to be a comfortable travelling
companion while supplying a fair degree of feedback and
control. You’re unlikely to set lap records, but you can
do very respectable point-to-point times. Steering was
light enough for a bike this size and the accuracy pretty
good.
By now, many would benefit from a suspension refresh or
upgrade.
Honda’s Dual Combined Braking System (DCBS) was by far the
most controversial part of the package. It was designed
so, no matter which lever you used, you got some front and
rear retardation. What you had was three by three-piston
brake calipers operated in various combinations by both
the foot and hand brake levers, and modulated by
proportioning valves. DCBS went through some ‘tuning’
changes over its lifespan.
Its advantage was it gave the bike a very stable and flat
attitude under hard braking. Disadvantages included no
separate control over the rear for low-speed manouvering,
plus – on the MkI version - the possibility you could lock
the rear brake with the font lever, albeit under very
extreme conditions. We’re talking solo super-hard braking
on a steep downhill surface where the rear wheel was
unloaded.
The second generation Blackbird scored an updated DCBS
‘tune’ and was better for it. Really either system was
easy enough to adapt to as a rider. In the workshop, you
need to be aware that bleeding the system is a little
different to most and actually reading the maker’s
instructions is advisable.
What really sells this model, particularly as a used buy,
is the quality of design and construction. This would rate
as one of the most ‘together’ motorcycles Honda ever
produced – it feels and looks like a quality product. I
reckon this aspect is what kept a lot of people in the
Honda fold, even when Suzuki came out with a newer and
shinier toy in the shape of the Hayabusa.
Servicing is relatively light on the wallet. The intervals
for shims/valve lash are 24,000km and I would not feel any
urge to shorten them. Aside from that it’s the usual
fluids and filters. It does take patience to get into
these things, as you need to remove a fair few components
to get to the top of the engine. It’s typical for a
fully-faired multi of the period, but still a chore.
Mileage really doesn’t worry these things, so long as they
get a little love. Something with 100,000km on it should
still be a very long way from worn out, though you might
consider a camchain and tensioner check-up as a
precaution.
There were three generations: carbureted, plus two
injected. The second injected bike had a catalytic
converter, which robbed some power, and a digital/analogue
dash mix.
Despite the fact I’ve whined about DCBS over the years,
I’ve owned all three variants and now have a first model
in the shed. That, I might add, still feels like a
surprisingly competent ride.
Prices seem to vary from $3000 to $10,000, with the middle
of that range offering some red-hot value if premium
condition and bang for your buck are prime concerns. Of
the three editions, the first will long-term be the most
collectible, while the second is my pick as a ride –
ultra-well sorted, still with full power, and a
traditional analogue dash. (See What Bird is That
below.)
Could it one day be a classic? Well I reckon it will
happen. It was a landmark model for the brand and has the
huge advantage of a sexy name with a good derivation.
Late-nineties motorcycles aren’t generally on the radar of
collectors just yet, but they will get there. In the
meantime you’d have something that is a truly good ride.
Blackbird’s Dad
Honda’s project leader on the Blackbird, Isao Yamanaka,
holidayed in Australia back in 2000 and took a little time
out to chat with a gaggle of bike journos. He turned out
to be a true bike nut with a fascinating background.
His career, which started with Honda in 1974, included
working on the teams for the Honda Bol d’Or series, the
notorious NR500/750 eight-valve project and numerous
others.
And his prime interests away from work? Football and beer…
What Bird is That?
Blackbirds were built from 1996 (for the 1997 model year)
through to 2007. There were three generations:
Several other running changes were made, for example a new
front hub and discs between gen 1 and 2, plus alterations
to the set-up of the linked brake system across all three
generations.
Blackbird vs Hayabusa vs ZX-12R
It seems to be one of those rules in life that
you can’t publish anything online about Blackbirds without
someone assuring you a 'Busa or a Kawasaki ZX-12R is
better. Well, yes and no.
Suzuki’s first-gen Hayabusa claimed more power (175 vs
164hp) and a little more torque lower down the rev range
(126Nm @ 6250rpm vs 124Nm @ 7250rpm). Equally significant
from a performance point of view was the claim for
superior aerodynamics and its accompanying dramatic
styling. In the end that meant a top speed of just over
300km/h versus 290.
As someone who owns all three models, I can tell you the
Blackbird is actually a more refined ride and probably the
pick for long trips. It’s smoother and just that little
bit better integrated. It also has linked brakes, which
may or may not be a benefit, depending on your point of
view.
The Hayabusa is a thoroughly entertaining brute with a
surprising level of civility when ridden gently, while the
Kawasaki is a very quick bit of kit with a little more
sporting potential.
So which one is better? It depends on what you’re looking
for…